Skip to content
Wealthoak.ai
Schedule a Walkthrough

Editorial policy

Research authorship, sources and corrections

Who publishes Wealthoak’s research library, how evidence is labelled, and what must be disclosed before a claim or independent review is published.

Published by Wealthoak Advisory LLP · Updated

Publisher and accountability

Wealthoak Advisory LLP is the corporate author and publisher of this library. Gaurav Karamchandani is its founder. Corporate authorship does not imply that a named analyst, external auditor or licensed adviser has reviewed an article.

Individual technical authors and reviewers will be named only when their role, credentials and contribution have been confirmed. We do not invent biographies, academic credentials, customer quotations or review endorsements.

Evidence labels

  • Design description: the intended purpose or documented product scope; not measured behaviour.
  • Educational example: an explicitly synthetic calculation; not a model result.
  • First-party observation: a sourced measurement with a defined version, period and method.
  • Independent assessment: a reviewer-issued document identifying scope, relationship, limitations and findings.

Source and update policy

Quantitative claims require the data basis, date, method and material limitations alongside the result. Original publication dates are retained. Modification dates change when the substance changes, not simply because the site was rebuilt. Funding, commercial relationships and selection criteria must be disclosed when relevant to an evaluation.

Tool-assisted preparation

Drafting and implementation may use software and AI-assisted tools. These tools are not authors, auditors or evidence of correctness. The publishing organization remains responsible for the content. Publication does not imply independent expert review.

Corrections

Email info@wealthoak.ai with the URL, disputed statement and supporting source. A substantive correction should identify what changed and update the publication record. Quietly changing an outcome while preserving its old provenance is not an acceptable correction.

Comparison policy

A comparison needs a defined product category, competitors, dated public sources, comparable tests and explicit unknowns. We do not turn missing competitor information into a favourable score or publish a worldwide superiority claim based on our own marketing.